III) While in the Model from the father of deceased namely Muhammad Iqbal (complainant of second version) fatal injury was attributed to Allah Ditta son of Haqnawaz and role attributed to the petitioner and others was simple existence with aerial firing without any injury to deceased or PWs.
Unfortunately, that was not real. Just two months after being placed with the Roe family, the Roe’s son explained to his parents that the boy experienced molested him. The boy was arrested two days later, and admitted to possessing sexually molested the few’s son several times.
Google Scholar – a vast database of state and federal case regulation, which is searchable by keyword, phrase, or citations. Google Scholar also allows searchers to specify which level of court cases to search, from federal, to specific states.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 5066/2024 (D.B.) Ayaz Hussain and 432 Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-224033 Tag:Specified the legal analysis on the subject issue, we are from the view that the claim of the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their First contract appointment and seniority and promotion thereon, from that angle just isn't legally seem, Moreover promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They're topic to rules and regulations If your recruitment rules of the topic post allow the case of your petitioners for promotion might be thought of, however, we've been very clear within our point of view that contractual service cannot be regarded for seniority and promotion given that the seniority is reckoned from the date of normal appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Health and fitness, subject matter to availability of vacancy subject matter on the approval of the competent authority.
The claimed recovery could be used, with the most, for corroboration of the main evidence, but by itself it cannot become a basis for conviction. They further submitted that the petitioners Bhoora and Mst. Mubeena Bibi also pointed out the place of incidence. The stated memo of pointation is irrelevant and inadmissible as practically nothing was discovered as a result of this sort of pointation. The place of incidence in addition to the place of throwing the dead body were already during the knowledge of witnesses before their pointation with the petitioners. Reliance is also placed on case legislation titled as “Ijaz Ahmad and Another v. The State” (1997 SCMR 1279) wherein it has been held with the august Supreme Court of Pakistan as under:
The ICAP Staff Service Rules, 2011 were framed because of the respondent/Institute, these rules may well not have the operates within a transparent legal and regulatory framework in the respondent/Institute. fourteen. In view of what has long been discussed over, without touching the merits on the case, the preliminary objection regarding the maintainability of the petition is sustained as well as the petition is held to generally be not maintainable in terms of Article 199 on the Constitution with the reason that non???statutory rules of service cannot be enforced through writ of mandamus website in terms of ratio in the judgment passed by the Supreme Court from the case of Pakistan Electric Power Company supra. Read more
148 . Const. P. 8180/2019 (D.B.) Saif Shujaat and Ors V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Provided the legal analysis on the subject issue, we have been with the view that the claim from the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their Original contract appointment and promotion thereon, from that angle isn't legally sound, Apart from promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They are really subject matter to rules and regulations If your recruitment rules of the topic post permit the case from the petitioners for promotion can be thought of, however, we have been very clear in our point of view that contractual service cannot be regarded as for seniority and promotion as the seniority is reckoned from the date of standard appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Health, matter to availability of vacancy topic towards the approval of the competent authority. Read more
48 . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Cell Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD 12 Justice of the Peace u/s 22-A is not obliged to afford a possibility of hearing to your accused party; nor obliged to automatically or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is needed to take into account all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid machinery of criminal law from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are a lot of the relevant factors. Read more
This system, for use by members of your Virginia State Bar and their designated staff, allows electronic filing of most civil cases in circuit court.
Therefore, this petition is found to become not maintainable and it is dismissed along with the pending application(s), as well as the petitioners may well request remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more
The scrupulous reader might have noticed something higher than: a flaw. Over and above the first 7 words, the definition focuses on the intention to cause “Injury,” not the intention to cause death. The two fundamental elements that must be proven in order to convict a person of the crime are “
Post arrest bail Granted, U/S 302 PPC, charge of conspiracy and ent could not be proved Until case is tried using(Bail Matters)
Because of this, simply citing the case is more prone to annoy a judge than help the party’s case. Think about it as calling someone to inform them you’ve found their lost phone, then telling them you live in these kinds of-and-these types of community, without actually supplying them an address. Driving across the neighborhood attempting to find their phone is likely being more frustrating than it’s worth.
The necessary analysis (called ratio decidendi), then constitutes a precedent binding on other courts; further analyses not strictly necessary towards the determination of your current case are called obiter dicta, which constitute persuasive authority but are usually not technically binding. By contrast, decisions in civil legislation jurisdictions are generally shorter, referring only to statutes.[four]